Nagpur: In an important observation of divorced and separate women, the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court said the emotional pressure or psychological effects caused by husbands on his wife, would definitely propose it even after he left a marriage house and took refuge with parents.
“Even if the physical cruelty in the matrimonial house might have stopped and does not occur at the parents’ house, there is no doubt that mental trauma and psychological pressure caused by husband’s actions, including verbal exchanges, who force the wife to leave the matrimonial house and take refuge with parents , will continue to stay at the parents’ house, “the division bench consisting of Hakeses Mahesh Sonak and Pushpa Ganediwala said.
Citing the Supreme Court’s verdict in similar cases, the bench adds to mental cruelty born to physical cruelty or rough and embarrassing verbal exchanges will continue in the home of parents even though there may be no action there.
“Even the silence of his wife might have a fundamental element of emotional pressure and mental suffering.
His suffering at a parent’s house can be directly attributed to the actions of husband’s atrocities in the house of words, and no doubt will be a consequence of his actions.
Such consequences will amount to a different violation Done in the house of a parent or another place where he has sheltered.
“HC observations came while hearing a woman’s request through advice Shireen Meghe challenged the decision of the RAM Nagar police station in Chandrapur to transfer the FIR submitted by her husband and in-laws based in the idea It’s wrong that they don’t have jurisdiction to investigate charges.
FIR was submitted under the IPC 377, 498-A, 504, and 506.
The 29-year-old applicant accused that the husband usually struggled regularly and even threatened to kill him.
He used to go home late at night, show his pornographic video, and first had unnatural sex, thus physically and mentally tortured him regularly.
Even after he delivered a princess, torture continued, because in-laws forbidden it to enter their homes.
Quoting the assessment of the APEX court in the case of Sunita Kimari Kashyap and Rupali Devi, the HC bench agreed to the Chandrapur police action to transfer an investigation into Pune.
“The consequences of the action at Pune’s wedding house, which is a violation, has occurred or very felt in Chandrapur.
All of this is a good and substantial reason to hold on to the Chandrapur police not only has enough jurisdiction, but also the task to investigate the charges made by Wife in his complaint, “said the judges.
HC: husband harassment can stop separating, not a wife’s trauma
