New Delhi: Given the complexity in the national capital, the central government must be given the freedom to choose who has to lead Delhi police forces, the Delhi High Court said on Tuesday.
It upholds the decision to appoint IPS officers Gujarat Rakesh Asthana as Commissioner of Police Delhi.
It also rules that there is no irregularity in the appointment process.
It shows that the procedure was adopted for Asthana’s appointment, where his tenure was extended, being followed for “almost more than a decade.” “Every unward incident in the national capital will have consequences, impacts, consequences, and implications not only in India but also in all international borders,” said the court.
“Given the unique police challenges in the capital, it is very important that the center has a joint movement for the appointment of the Police Commissioner, Delhi,” Chairman of the Judge DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh observed challenging choices.
“Delhi, becoming the capital of India, has a unique, special and specific requirement.
It has witnessed some unwanted incidents and very challenging laws and the situation of order / riots / crime, which has international implications, which in the wisdom of the central government requires appointment An experienced officer who has a diverse and diverse experience for mass martawan.
Security power is released from other factors, “said the court further.
Sadre Alam’s Appliances Seeking July 27 from the Ministry of Home Affairs appointed Asthana as Commissioner of the Delhi Police while giving him representatives and extension of service with one year.
The court also believes that the center has strength under the law to provide representatives between cadres and relax the rules of the service to allow the extension of services outside the pension date.
The applicant has claimed that Asthana’s appointment in clear and openly violations of the direction of the Supreme Court.
A NGO has also challenged Asthana’s appointment before the Supreme Court, which was later beaten with pills and heard by the High Court.