New Delhi: The Supreme Court has refused to disrupt the orders of the Allahabad High Court which directed the Central Investigation Bureau (CBI) to investigate cases related to the alleged death of the 24-year-old man’s custodian in February this year.
The APEX court rejected a request submitted by the authority of Uttar Pradesh against September 8 in the High Court who had observed that there was sufficient material on the record of the prime facie revealing the commission of a violation and involvement of officers who were higher in conspiracy and creating false evidence.
to protect the defendant.
The Supreme Court said that the CBI would investigate this problem independently without being influenced by any observations carried out in the judgment of the High Court.
This case is related to the death of the 24-year-old Krishna Yadav alias Pujari, according to FIR registered in Jaunpur District, allegedly picked up by the police from his home on February 11.
Alleged information the following day was accepted that Yadav had died.
The problem arose to hear before the APEX court bench from the judge, advice and aniruddha Bose.
“Having heard SV Raju, additional lawyers General, at length and in exemplary notes, we did not find land for disruption with the direction of the High Court for investigations in this issue by CBI,” Bench said in October.
25 orders.
“However, given the facts of this case, we direct that the CBI will investigate this problem independently and in accordance with the law without being influenced by observations carried out in the judgment of the High Court.
Special leave petition, therefore, was dismissed,” said the apex court.
The High Court has passed the command which directed the CBI to investigate cases where FIR was registered on February 12 because of alleged violations under various parts of the Criminal Code, including 302 (murder).
It quoted FIR who filed a complaint of the late brother who said several police officers came to Yadav’s house on February 11 and took him away with the intention to involve him and he was detained at the police station.
The High Court has noted that the police record claimed Yadav was arrested when he rode a motorcycle and he fell and received an injury.
Also note that the police records said that after Jadav was taken to the police station, he was sent for first aid and doctors referred him to care to the district hospital but when they got there, he died.
“Clear from the Affidavit counter and a copy of a diary as produced before we …
Prima Facie shows that all police efforts somehow gave Chit Chit for the defendant and for this purpose important evidence abandoned and some evidence was being made and manipulated,” said the court high, “fair,” fair, “fair).
Investigation is the foundation for a fair trial.”
SC refused to interfere with the HC order directing the CBI to investigate the alleged case of custodian death
