Thiruvananthapuram: In the Major set back to the CBI investigating the point of conspiracy behind the famous ISRO espionage case, the district session court here on Tuesday approved the pre-arrest applicant submitted by Retired DGP Siby Mathews, who was charged as accused of being accused of fourth in the case.
A big violation that was charged with Mathews was kidnapping or kidnapping, giving or making false evidence and criminal conspiracy.
Judge, R Krishna Kumar, who was held in the order that when the entire diary and report on the Justice Jain Committee had been careful, he did not find the material that would be prime facie showing violations under the IPC 365 section (kidnapping).
There is no ingredient to show that there is a conspiracy.
There was no dispute that all the accused of being produced in front of jurisdiction for a period of 24 hours and at that time or even after that, one of them raised the complaints that they were limited or kidnapped by the investigation body.
To deny the recovery of pre-capture guarantees to someone who is accused of violations not laughing, the Investigation Agency is expected to show that there are several materials that will show the prime facie that the applicant’s custodian interrogation is very necessary to move further or that if the person accused is released by guarantee , He will escape from justice or that he will disturb the investigation or at least that such exercise will oppose a larger public interest.
However, considering the career path and age of the applicant, he could not use such steps, the judge held on order.
The judge argued that in terms of the arrest of the Petitioner, the investigative officer was directed to enlarge it to a guarantee for a period of 60 days, on executing bonds for RS 1 Lakh with two solvent solutions in the condition that the applicant would not go to the state without permission of the jurisdictional court; He will report before the investigation officer to be interrogated and when needed; He will not damage the evidence or influence witnesses; He would not be involved in a temporary violation in the guarantee and he would fully work with the investigation, including subjecting himself to police prisoners who were considered to be inquiry purposes.
Setback for CBI as Mathews given anticipatory guarantee
