Chandigarh: Underpointing the stress effect and military service tension in the medical conditions of defense personnel, Chandigarh armed forces (AFT) have set aside retirement disability rejection of the pretext of ‘hypertension’ are ‘lifestyle diseases’ occur in the ‘peace area’.
Chandigarh bench from AFT, which consists of justice Dharam Chand Chanudhary and Deputy Admiral H S Becht, has passed this order while hearing the petition filed by Colonel Jagir Singh from Amritsar.
The applicant was assigned in 1963 and was released from services after serving in various fields of fields and peace in low medical categories with ‘hypertension’.
Despite disability was declared ‘exacerbated by stress and military service strains “by the Medical Council Release (RMB), he was then made to undergo another medical council by the authorities who declared his disability’ Nothing was associated with, also not exacerbated (Nana.) By military service.
‘Being’ lifestyle disease ‘that occurs in’ peace area ‘.
Mention such reasons grown far and underlines that military personnel who serve even in peace areas can suffer stress and tension services posted away from their families, the court has been Directing the government to release disability pensions in accordance with similar case laws.
SC and various high courts have previously argued that if someone joins military service in the appropriate medical condition, then there is an assumption that medical conditions arise in service, except for health negligence Someone, considered influenced by Laya Nan conditions and no difference can be made between ‘peace’ and ‘fields’ for the provision of disability pensions.
The high-level expert committee formed to reduce litigation in the defense ministry for the guidance of the Minister of Defense Manohar Parragar in 2015 has observed that the regimen lifestyle, which lives far from family, limited rights, movements and inability to fulfill domestic commitment all plus in aggravating medical conditions Defense personnel and even the rules are quite liberal but are being narrowly interpreted by the authorities.
The committee also observes that these things must be estimated in court based on cases – cases, have been borne by the decision of the Supreme Court and the High Court.
Experts say that the Ministry of Defense (MOD) has issued papers that apply recommendations, but such cases are still contested by military authorities in court and court, resulting in waste of public money and labor, documents, and loads from delays, regardless of from delay.