Colva: Additional session Judge Durga Madkaikar rejected the anticipatory assurance application from the alleged rape accusing Michael Crasto quoting court jurisdiction.
The Cuncolim police have registered a violation of the defendant on September 30, after surviving complaining that the defendant sexually exploited him since 2010, when he was only 15 years old.
He stated that the defendant threatened to kill his father if the exploitation was narrated to his parents.
The accusation began to follow him wherever he used to leave, because he even stopped his studies, it was stated in complaints.
Police Cuncolim enrolled a violation under the provisions of IPC, Goa Child Law, Section 6, 12 Children’s Protection of Sexual Offens (Pocso) Law and Scheduled Casta and System Schedule (Prevention of Atrocity) Act 1989, as a tribal community survivor Scheduled.
The Public Prosecutor G Gaonkar proposed that the violation committed by the applicant can be trusted by the Court of Children and not by the additional session court.
Likewise, other violations suspected of being carried out by the applicant are under the caste schedule and sales of the tribes scheduled to be AWCT, 1989, and ACT Pocso, which is a court today do not have jurisdiction to decide the Guarantee application.
(The identity of the victim has not been disclosed to protect his privacy in accordance with the direction of the Supreme Court about cases related to sexual violence)
The court refused pre-capture pre-arrest accused by rape
