Thiruvananthapuram: A week after the Senior Congress Single Ramesh Chennithala lifted a series of questions about the alleged rejection of the Governor in this matter.
In the letter dated December 7, VC remembers the previous meeting he had with Chancellor and stated that some members in my Syndicate had rejected Chancellor’s advice that DLitt Honor was given to the President.
“I met his superiority last week.
After the meeting I have discussed with several syndicate members about the problem of giving a Dlit title to the noble, the President of India.
The syndicate member,” SIC), “the letter was said.
That was the following day the governor wrote a letter complicated for the minister of Head Pinarayi Vijayan at the level of political intervention that was unacceptable in the higher education sector and expressed his desire to give up the entrance of the most early state university.
However, the governor in his letter did not specifically mention the answers he received from Ku VC.
Many people inside Academic and legal circles that are heated by casual ways of my VC reacts to proposals about the Dlitt everyites in the country in the country.
According to the procedure, VC should put the proposal as an agenda before syndicate into the notes and blown It.
VC must then share the resolution with Chancellor, preferably, with a note about a place that makes VC from doing Chancellor’s recommendations.
Because every citizen is free to make such suggestions to universities, suggestions by Chancellor, that also to provide DLITT to the President cannot be interpreted as a wrong step in the governor who is claimed by several political leaders, they said.
Like what happened in the case of the Governor’s letter to CM, the VC letter to the Governor also came out when the governor was not at the station.
Khan, who on several occasions refused to admit or rejected the claim about Delit Row, had gone to Delhi at 6.
January.
He expected back in Raj Bhavan on January 10.
CM and CPM leaders have stated that they did not realize me.
The rejection of the governor’s proposal.
With the letter it is now leaking, the state government and CPM will be forced to come out with direct reply.
If syndicate members refuse to have a VC claim, it can be charged.
Meanwhile, Chennithala said VC crossed all the limits and fostered procedural norms.
“VC does not have the power to measure the pleasure of syndicates without holding meetings and discuss this problem.
Here, VC has given a reply after personally searching for syndicate members.
Now, for the government to clarify whether syndicate members do act according to government direction or not.
-Gomongan, VC, who failed to carry out his duties, had lost its right to continue the position, “said Chennithala.
The University of Kerala’s VC letter said syndicate members rejected Dlitt to the President
