Thiruvananthapuram: The day after the Women’s Commission recorded a case in lost children complaints submitted by former SFI leader Anupama S Chandran, CPM District Secretary Anavoor Nagappan, on Friday, acknowledging that the party’s district unit knew about all gloomy episodes.
Nagappan said he had never taken steps from Anupama’s interest and his son, but only suggested his father and Local CPM leader Peroorkada Jayachandran to return the child to his daughter.
As soon as he was told that the child was taken away, he then suggested Anupama to take a legal path to get his baby, he claimed.
However, Anupama and her husband Ajith said that Nagappan had changed his statement.
When they met Nagappan and seek his help after the police refused to investigate the complaint, he shouted at them.
“He doesn’t offer to help or ask us to take a legal path,” Anupama said.
Meanwhile, the Minister of Welfare of Women and Children Veena George searched a comprehensive department report on complaints that the baby was forcibly taken from the mother by his parents and was given to adoption with the help of the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) and the Child Welfare Council.
“A woman in trouble does not need to file a formal complaint while looking for justice and assistance.
Even whatsapp messages are enough to conduct an investigation and provide assistance,” George said when the reason cwc was taken to the notification.
Anupama, Ajib’s repeated their complaints on Friday that Peroorkada police refused to register a case under the influence of political leadership.
Allegedly that his parents took a baby born before Ajith and Anupama married.
Anupama has given birth to a boy at a private hospital on October 19, 2020.
Meanwhile, the opposition leader VD Satheesan and State President BJP K Surendran said shocked at the appatis of the police in this incident.
“I don’t want to mix politics …
it is surprising that even leaders of student wing students and teenagers CPM are rejected by justice.
Mothers and children must be reunited.
We cannot allow the party party and party court to decide on the case,” SatheMedan said.
Surendran said the Women’s Commission and CWC worked against the interests of stakeholders.
“The silence of cultural leaders and women’s activists for the incident doubts,” he added.