Mumbai: Cricket, like any sport, arousing emotions.
More and more points of view are polemic, the more talked about.
And more and more are discussed, the more started bordering controversial.
The latest debate about the BCCI view of the Kashmir Premier League (KPL) is one of them, except that this is not only cricket.
This cricket and so on, one which partially requires BCCI to take a stand but most remain a matter of state sovereignty.
In that case, the cricket board takes a stand in the league – which will be played in Kashmir, which is occupied by Pakistan (POK) and makes it very clear that it will not be involved with stakeholders who choose to participate, in principle, a by-product of how he wants Solve problems with potentially larger consequences.
And to conclude things, the council said, “Now our holder has been spelled hard and clearly, this problem must rest.
This is not the debate”.
“BCCI has taken a stand that is in line with not only the government today but the government’s past.
When it arrives at the subject of Pok, the BCCI holder is clear because the Indian government holder is clear.
So, where is the debate?” Say those who oversee board affairs.
And, if BCCI has chosen to let other stakeholders in the game know about where it is in this matter, there is a level of death of nationality among its members and the office carrier that it is the right thing to do.
“And as I said, the opinion is a refee-a-dozen.
Gibbs Herschelle might have his own thoughts.
So, he should have it, but not BCCI, right?” Say those who trace this development.
Gibbs recently tweeted: ‘Not necessarily @bci to bring their political agenda with Pakistan into the equation and try to prevent me from playing at @ kpl_20.
Also threatening me said they would not allow me to enter India for work related to cricket.
Ludicrous.
‘Immediately after that, the former Pakistani AllRounder Shahid Afridi Retweet Gibbs with the following:’ Very disappointing that BCCI once again mixed cricket and politics! KPL is a league for Kashmir, Pakistan and cricket fans throughout the world.
We will install a beautiful show and will not be blocked with such behavior !! “Ludicrous,” when Gibbs said this was heard and “disappointing” because this was possible for Afridi, BCCI was clear that it did not give anyone the choice here.
“On the contrary, the Council of India makes it very clear that it has a problem with problems that will not change.
Where is the debate? If he still wants to go ahead, he is free to do it?” Officials in India said.
However, Toi understands that with BCCI makes it really clear, the cricket board (read: full member of the international cricket council, except the Pakistani cricket board) has been returned according to BCCI’s view.
While the PCB quickly criticized BCCI in this matter and said it would take a problem with the ICC, ICC has stated that it will not interfere in this problem.
Meanwhile the Indian cricket board found it very stupid on the part of those who had ‘triggered this controversy’.
“BCCI has an attitude on this problem.
It’s simple.
There is no sports federation anywhere in the world will have a point of view that is contrary to the government and their country.
Give me an example and I will accept it.
BCCI does not ask the cricket board to refrain from participating In the Pakistani Super League (PSL), right? “Officials added.
There is speculation that the British cricket board agrees to remove the players from the Kashmir League because there is a possibility that BCCI allows a certain age group of players to participate within a hundred.
However, council officials laughed.
“Let me make this a little clear – this subject doesn’t come with barter choices,” said an Indian Council official.