Prayagraj: The High Court of Allahabad has issued a notice to Keshav Prasad Maurya, Deputy Chief of the Minister of Upper, called for him to submit a response in response to the alleged accusation in the alleged dispute.
In the WRIT petition submitted by One Wisnu Murti Tripathi of Prayagraj, some serious charges of Malafide have been made against Maurya, which has been made respondents (vice versa) number six.
“It was said that Maurya had a long criminal history and with her support that private respondents tried to reach the Petitioner’s house,” added the command.
When posting this problem for January 10, 2022 for the next hearing, the division bench consisting of Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Justice Om Prakash Tripathi in the order of December 6 also directed the state government to submit a reward in responding to the WRIT petition.
According to the case file, there was a dispute regarding home ownership in Kalindipuram watch out YOJNA in Prayagraj between the applicants and private respondents.
In the Writ petition, Wisnu Murti Tripathi from Prayagraj has made Malafide’s serious accusations against Maurya, alleged that with Maurya’s support, private respondents tried to reach the Petitioner’s house.
Previously on October 6, 2021, the court after hearing both parties had observed, “complaints that were urged in the instant petition were that the Applicant, who had house number No.
GI 456 EWS, Basera Kalindipuram was awased YOJNA, was displaced there June 6, 2018 by intervention State machine.
To support the dispute, Reliance has been placed on communication sent by Respondents Keshav Prasad Maurya, Deputy Chief of the Minister of Up, to the Senior Police Supervisor (SSP), Prasagraj on March 14, 2018 where private respondents have requested home ownership delivered to him based on certain investigation reports and senior police supervisors are directed to take the necessary steps and tell him ) On it.
The applicant is suspected of filing Like in this case about various authorities but no pay attention to being paid in the same thing and hence, the instant petition has been submitted.
“However, it appeared on behalf of private respondents, Nasihnya had stated that a civil suit was delayed in connection with the material mentioned above.
He further stated that the affidavit cons had been submitted by private respondents in front of the court.
HC Problem Notification for Mauryain Alleged House Grab Case
