Prasagraj: The Government of Uttar Pradesh has anti-conversion law in a written statement in the presence of the High Court of Allahabad, states that “because marriage is used as an instrument to change individual religion to His will, Uttar Pradesh Conversion of the laws who violate the law, 2021 seeks to improve Malady “.
Following the direction of the High Court, a written statement from the government was submitted in response to a group of public interest litigation (PILS) challenged the action.
Significantly, while emphasizing that the interests of the community will always apply to the interests of individuals, the upper government has added that the law in challenges seeks to protect the public interest and maintain public order, and protect the interests of the community.
“When there is a fear of psychosis in the wider community and the community itself is endangered and giving up on pressure which results in strong conversion, it is necessary that the interests of the community as a whole requires protection and no individual flower microanalysis can be seen.
Inside,” further written statement Before the court.
It has been confirmed in a statement that the law is identical in nature for existing laws at least in eight state states.
In addition to Uttar Pradesh, such laws are prevalent in neighboring countries such as Nepal, Myanmar, Bhutan, Sri Lanka and Pakistan as well.
Furthermore, Affidavit stated that there was a lot of data in public records that showed that forced conversion actually created psycho fears in all states, which in turn guaranteed the need for these legislation.
Referring to cases of a Hindu woman or a man who wants to marry a Muslim man or woman, a written statement: “Even though Hindu women want to not give up their faith, he must let go of his faith to enter into a legitimate marriage and accept Islam as his faith.
This is will amount to a strong conversion.
The position remains the same if a Hindu boy wants to marry a Muslim girl.
Hindu boys must accept Islam.
“Calling this exercise loss of dignity, written statements claim that conversion in these cases is not done as an option but due to coercion because of personal legal intervention.
Against this background, Affidavit handed over that action only gave a relative of the power to file firm in a strong conversion case and that the action was running to ensure that each individual was given the same moral membership in the community.
Finally, the government in the answer also emphasized that the applicant was motivated by social media propaganda ‘Ghar Wapasi’ and had not focused on legal issues.
Therefore, they abuse the legal process by applying instant pills and using the same as a tool for publicity.
The government defended anti-conversion law in HC, said he was trying to maintain public interest
