Bengaluru: The legislature on Friday filed a bill to ban online gaming for online gambling and gambling to “weaning them (people) far from the deputy gambling”.
Talking bills, specifically, changes the form of games or online gambling what is prohibited.
In the prohibited online gaming definition, the bill said: “Gaming, covering all the forms of bets or bets in connection with any coincidence game …
included in the form of a valued token before or after the problem, or electronic facilities and virtual currency, Electronic fund transfers in connection with any coincidence game …
“The bill, however, free the lotteries and bets or bet on horse races on the race line inside or outside the state or outside the state.
Gaming for profit, will be prohibited whether it is played on a mobile application or on a computer located within the boundaries of a person’s house or in cyber cafes.
The bill, as a prevention for people to be involved in gambling, has also increased prison sentences of up to three years and / or up to RS 1 Lakh well.
The state government has justified online gaming prohibitions to get profit by claiming that the goal is to curb threats playing games through the internet, cellular application and weaning people from comparable gambling.
Meanwhile, assembly passed the identification of prisoners’ bills amid fears of violations of the right to privacy and determination of the detention center, to monetize human resources among convicts, which are criticized by the opposition section as too “idealist” for the country prison.
As per the initiative of the Prisons Development Board, the Government intends to use prisoners to prepare consumer and industrial products and monetize available human resources.
The Minister of Home Affairs Arga Jnanendra said the decision to establish a board was taken after taking into account such setup in Harayana and Punjab.
“In Harayana, the state government has been able to generate RS 600 crore income every year and help the prisoners have a considerable amount stored for their future goals after being released,” Minister said.
The bill also talked about monetizing an empty or old prison building that was not used.
However, some opposition legislators criticized the move because it was too far away.
“When we talk about establishing a detention board, it is something that should not be considered in the current situation when the poor condition of prison facilities and the lack of appropriate psychological care for proven custody.
In the ideal world, board settings will be appreciated well.
However, When we cannot understand and prepare detention for the future without mental health care, it does not make sense to make money from human resource prisoners, “said Congress Mla Ramesh Kumar.
Congress Mla Shahahath Bacchegowda said that such initiatives by governments around the world have also been criticized for serious human rights violations carried out in prison, including the United States.
On the identification bill of detainees, the right for undistrial privacy was raised by opposition legislators, where Jnanendra clarified that the collection of their blood samples, their hair follicles and scanning Retina Iris would be collected only for those who were punished for a period of one month or more.
“As a result, basically, helping the police track customary violators and close cases faster,” he said.
Online gaming for profit, gambling can go
