Bengaluru: The former Metro Namma employee and Whistleblower accused that BMRCL has appointed several employees without the qualification and experience in the HR department.
“Many HR personnel were appointed without participating in recruitment procedures for notifying posts in newspapers and without conducting interviews.
According to the cadres and the Rules of Metro Recruitment, candidates must have a postgraduate degree in the Discipline or MBA (HR), MSW (HR), and have The relevant years of HR experience in both the government or PSU, “said the reporter with complaints to BMRCL management.
“BMRCL has made a series of human resources promises, especially retired government officials, without the level of postgraduate and human resources experience,” read complaints.
“Many of them are graduates of BA / BSC, retirees from government departments such as income, finance, police and 65 years and over and government pensions with public fisheries fees, “added the complainant.
Stoi has a list of nine designated officials and five of them above the age of 65.
However, the Managing Director of BMRCL Anjum Parwez said: “We are always looking for people who are experienced in a higher position on the basis of the contract and we extend the people over 65 years The case where the person is very important for the organization.
In general, we cut down a lot on more than 65 employees.
The officers mentioned have years of experience in the government and the public sector.
“Meanwhile, the Center for the report about the presence of employees, the center has been Looking for reports from BMRCL on complaints with irregularities in the presence of biometric employees.
Vice President of the BMRCL employee Suryanarayana Murthy has approached the Ministry of Housing and Urban (Mohua) union in this matter.
“Many employees mark biometric presence by damaging the system.
They report to late tasks, leave the office early or take leave.
There should be a comprehensive investigation about this,” Murthy said, adding there was also a deviation in the appointment of entry-level workers.
In the December 21 letter for the BMRCL implementing director, Mohua said: “The complaint can be examined and the appropriate reply that handles the points raised can be sent to the applicant under the intimacy to the Ministry.” Parwez ignored the charges, saying Murthy was “self-proclaimed union leader who did not get a lot of lifts in BMRCL”.
BMRCL was accused of renting HR staff who did not meet the requirements and strengths
