Guwahati: The Assam government has submitted before the Gautati High Court who was expelled by a family of Darrang in Darrang District in September last year was not a migrant affected by erosion as claimed in pills but “penetrated,” which did not qualify for rehabilitation under rehabilitation country.
2020 policy Pil submitted by opposition leader Debabrata Saikia.
“Dholpur regional residents who were expelled had migrated to these areas of various parts of the state and because the land in this area was fertile, they gradually occupied and achieved large fertile land.
In Garb did not have land, some individuals had also become land grabbers, “Government affidavit is added.
Therefore, what is expelled by Dholpur will be moved “subject to verification of status status that is erosion and does not have land in each place and district, citizenship and existing rehabilitation policies,” said information from the government.
Government Regulations say that every time the family becomes a victim of erosion and then changes without land, they must report to the revenue authority, which is recorded in “The Gara Khahania Register” and finally the certificate of erosion-affected and does not have the land issued for the original land holder moved by Flood or soil erosion.
“However, residents of Dholpur Char and the ancestors they have never produced the certificate released from the original place where they have claimed to have migrated.
Therefore, forced migration claims due to floods and erosion are not true,” the circle was sent.
The circle officer proposed that the state government “rehabilitation policy for the erosion affected by the Assam family, 2020” does not cover the displacement of government land and clearly states that “the family who occupies the government’s land as accusation does not qualify for rehabilitation.
Circle officers submitted that” The expulsion conducted in the area of Char Dholpur under the circle of Sipajhar’s income is not at all illegal actions and the seizure has been removed in accordance with the provisions of the rules framed below Assam Land Regulations, 1886.
“
Dholpur moved the ‘encroachment’, said the Government of Assam to the High Court
