Gahati HC provides guarantees to be accused of cases of rape of IIT – News2IN
Guwahati

Gahati HC provides guarantees to be accused of cases of rape of IIT

Gahati HC provides guarantees to be accused of cases of rape of IIT
Written by news2in

Guwahati: The Jahati High Court, while holding that there is a case of the Prima Facie on the defendant in IIT, the case of the rape of Guwahati, has given him a guarantee in the land accused of being a talented student of the country’s future assets.
Police on April 3 have arrested a 21-year-old student for allegedly “attacking sex” a female student of the Institute on March 28.
He then “suspended” by the authorities of IIT.
Jiment bench Ajit Borthakur After hearing advice for both parties – by referring to FIR, medical reports and statements under Section 161 and 164 CRPC, the contents of the accusation sheet, the Committee’s report findings facts – said there was a clear case of the Prima Facie as a suspicion of the defendant .
“However, because the investigation into this case was completed and both informants / victims and defendants were the country’s future assets were talented students pursuing technical courses in IIT, Guwahati, who were young in the age group 19 to 21 years.
Only and they came from two Different countries, the continued detention of the defendant for the benefit of the trial, if the allegations are framed, it may not be necessary, “said the court on August 13 said.
Appeared in the name of the victim’s girl, Sumitra Sarma advocate and additional Public Prosecutor Da, violently opposed the granting of the defendant in serious violations.
Sarma quoted an assessment ratio related to the factors that must be considered while providing guarantees provided by the Supreme Court.
The defendant was charged for violations under Section 376 (rape) / 328 (causing injuries in a poison) / 307 (murder efforts) / 120B (criminal conspiracy) IPC.
However, the court found that “there is no possibility that is accused of damaging evidence or influencing the witness directly or indirectly, if released on guarantee”.
“It was resolved by law while dealing with the application of collateral, the court was not called to discuss the advantages or shortcomings of available evidence to the defendant, but several reasons to conclude prime facies while guarantees must be indicated.
In short,” he said.
(By Robikuz Age)

About the author

news2in