BENGALURU: Legislation cannot be allowed in a dacoity case only on the ground the chargesheet was registered, the high court has repeatedly held, while devoting bond to 3 Nepalis accused of stealing valuables out of a home in Koramangala.
“The petitioners are in Nepal.
But, it’s claimed they are permanent inhabitants of Bengaluru, however there’s not any record to show that.
In the event the request is enabled and the petitioners are expanded on bail, then they can tamper with all the prosecution witnesses and might abscond into Nepal,” Justice K Natarajan has seen.
Sagarika, a pupil, had registered a complaint that in 2.30am on December 26, 2020, once she had been lonely in the home, the accused barged into her home and robbed of Rs 5 lakh, silver and gold decorations.
Kamal Jajo Vishwakarma, Janaki Jaishi and Sunil Bahadur Shahi (detained 5 to seven ) had approached the high court following the semester court rejected their bail .
They maintained there is contradiction at the criticism and chargesheet, without a examination identification parade has been conducted by authorities.
Claiming innocence, they argued that they’re citizens of KR Puram and could adhere to any requirements to be enforced by the court.
On the flip side, the prosecution asserted that when released on bond, they may abscond into Nepal.
Karnataka HC rejects bail to 3 Nepalis from dacoity case
