Punjab: Bikram Majithia is ordered in a drug case – News2IN
Chandigarh

Punjab: Bikram Majithia is ordered in a drug case

Punjab: Bikram Majithia is ordered in a drug case
Written by news2in

Chandigarh: The Punjab police on Monday night registered FIR against the Legislator of Shiroman Akali Dal (sad) and former Minister of Bikram Singh Majithia cabinet in connection with drug cases.
Majithia has been ordered under section 25, 27A, and 29 of the drug narcotics law and psychotropic substances (NDPS), in 1985, to consciously allow the use of its property for drug smuggling, financing drugs forbidden drugs, and for reduction.
and criminal conspiracy in drug smuggling.
FIR has been registered at the State Crime Police Station in Mohali based on a status report submitted by the Anti-Drug Special Task Force (STF) Head of ADGP Harpp Singh Sidhu in February 2018.
“As per the findings, the prime facie there is sufficient evidence in the note to investigate Furthermore, the role of SH Bikram Singh Majithia in connection with the allegations made in the application based on the question, “The head of the STF has recommended in the status report submitted to the Punjab High Court and Haryana in drug-related cases – CWP 20359 of 2013 and CWP 15916 in 2017.
Deputy Chairperson of Sukhjinder Minister Singh Randhawa, who also held a home portfolio, said, “The police will arrest Majithia and investigate this case with a legal process.” Punjab Police are a special three-member investigation team (sitting) consisting of AIG Balraj Singh, DSP Kulwant Singh, and Rajesh Kumar, to investigate the case against Majithia.
Observing the DGP Registration of FIR Registration in Narcotics CaseOfficiating DGP Siddharth Chattopadhyaya has directed the State Bureau of Investigation on Monday to register FIR in the case based on the Stf Head Status report.
“This case must be investigated by a special investigation team whose orders are issued separately,” DGP the lead has written to the Investigation Bureau.
The FIR which was running to 49 pages finally registered on Monday night where the contents of the STF status report February 2018, reported Majithia’s Interrogation by the Directorate of Enforcement in Jalandhar on December 26, 2014, and the legal opinion provided by Advocates General 1 had been reproduced.
Chattopadhyaya directs the investigation bureau, “in the case mentioned in the report (STF) and cases related to drug trafficking, it is important that violations of parts 25, 27a and 29 of the NDPS law, regardless of additional violations shown or may appear later, need Investigated.
“The leading DGP said that it was in the note that many people demanded in these cases have been convicted of violations based on the NDPS law by the court.
“Participating in the manufacture, processing, transportation, sales, trade, and narcotics distribution is a violation.
Facilitating, conspiring, conspiring, assisting, and getting financial benefits of the violation and the professional results and use of illegal results received from drug trading activities It is a violation.
Using such money and profits in various business efforts and illegal activities is also a violation under relevant laws.
Such actions themselves are a respected violation, “DGP said.
Chattopadhyaya added that the use of intentional government machines, including vehicles and security personnel and other government facilities to help, facilitate, and end drug trafficking and other related illegal activities is also a violation.
Advocate General Opinivocio General Deepinder Singh Patwalia has been voting on December 1, “In my opinion which was deemed to have been formed after going through the process before the Hon’ble Court and notes that were available to me that there were no obstacles / no obstacles / embargo for STF or the Government State or in this case every law enforcement agency to act on the report submitted before the Hon’ble Court.
“Patwalia said in fact, the High Court had made it clear that law enforcement agencies must act on this report in accordance with the law.
He stressed that the status report submitted in the sealed cover before the High Court would not operate as a period of stay because it acted based on a report by STF or the state government.

About the author

news2in